Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
<scp>ChatGPT</scp> ‐4 in Nursing Research: A Methodological Evaluation of Bias Risk in Randomized Controlled Trials
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The AI-based tools have the potential to expedite bias assessment in systematic reviews. However, this study demonstrates that ChatGPT-4o, in its current form, lacks sufficient consistency, indicating that such tools should be integrated cautiously and used under continuous human oversight, particularly in evidence-based evaluations that inform clinical decision-making.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.578 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.470 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.984 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.814 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.