Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparative Efficacy of ChatGPT and Gemini in Addressing Patient Queries on Gonarthrosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
< 0.001). ChatGPT demonstrated better performance with a mean accuracy score of 8.7 ± 0.9 compared with Gemini's 7.2 ± 1.1. Patient satisfaction scores aligned with expert evaluations, with ChatGPT achieving a mean satisfaction score of 8.9 ± 0.8 versus Gemini's 7.5 ± 1.2. Notably, ChatGPT excelled in providing comprehensive explanations of surgical procedures (mean score: 9.2 ± 0.7) and postoperative care (9.1 ± 0.8), whereas Gemini performed better in offering concise summaries of recovery timelines (8.4 ± 0.9). This study demonstrates that ChatGPT offers more accurate and satisfactory responses to patient queries regarding gonarthrosis and TKA compared with Gemini. The findings suggest that AI platforms, particularly ChatGPT, can serve as valuable tools in augmenting patient education and potentially reducing preoperative anxiety. Future studies should investigate the incorporation of AI-assisted information delivery into clinical practice and its long-term effects on patient outcomes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.593 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.483 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.003 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.824 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.