Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Reliability of AI-generated responses on frequently-posed questions by patients with chronic kidney disease
1
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
BackgroundAI tools are becoming primary information sources for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, as AI sometimes generates factual or inaccurate information, the reliability of information must be assessed.MethodsThis study assessed the AI-generated responses to frequently asked questions on CKD. We entered Japanese prompts with top CKD-related keywords into ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini. The Quality Analysis of Medical Artificial Intelligence (QAMAI) tool was used to evaluate the reliability of the information.ResultsWe included 207 AI responses from 23 prompts. The AI tools generated reliable information, with a median QAMAI score of 23 (interquartile range: 7) out of 30. However, information accuracy and resource availability varied (median (IQR): ChatGPT versus Copilot versus Gemini = 18 (2) versus 25 (3) versus 24 (5), <i>p</i> < 0.01). Among AI tools, ChatGPT provided the least accurate information and did not provide any resources.ConclusionThe quality of AI responses on CKD was generally acceptable. While most information provided was reliable and comprehensive, some information lacked accuracy and references.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.250 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.109 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.482 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.434 Zit.