Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Diagnostic performance of ChatGPT in detecting gastrointestinal tract perforation on chest radiographs: a comparative study
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) tract perforation is a surgical emergency requiring rapid diagnosis, often via chest radiography. Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models like ChatGPT, has potential to enhance medical imaging but its efficacy in detecting GI perforation is unclear. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 with human experts in interpreting chest radiographs for GI perforation. Methods: This retrospective study, approved by the Arel University Hospital Ethics Committee (E-52857131-050.06.04-455896), analyzed 504 chest radiographs from patients diagnosed with GI perforation between 2010 and 2021. Radiographs were classified into three groups: definite GI perforation, suspicious requiring further imaging, or no perforation. Two clinicians (emergency medicine specialist and general surgeon) independently evaluated radiographs, followed by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 using a standardized prompt. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with chi-square tests, and decision-making times with Student’s t-test (p
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.214 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.071 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.429 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.418 Zit.