Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Effectiveness of AI-assisted rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders: a network meta-analysis of pain, range of motion, and functional outcomes
6
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of 13 artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted rehabilitation strategies for individuals with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), categorized based on different intervention types, including AI feedback systems, exergaming platforms, telerehabilitation, and robotic solutions. The analysis focuses on improvements in pain relief, functional outcomes, and range of motion (ROM), based on a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A systematic review and NMA were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) were searched for RCTs published between January 2000 and April 2025. A total of 33 RCTs involving participants with MSDs were included. Interventions were categorized into 13 AI-assisted rehabilitation strategies. The outcomes were grouped into three domains: pain, functional outcomes, and ROM. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values and mean ranks were used to compare the relative effectiveness of each intervention. The Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool was used to assess the bias risk of the studies, and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool was applied to evaluate the credibility of the evidence. Results: For pain relief, Therapeutic Exergaming (SUCRA = 87.6%) and Robotic Exoskeleton (SUCRA = 86.3%) ranked highest. In functional outcomes, Gamified Exergaming (SUCRA = 99.6%) and Hybrid Physical Therapy combined with Exergaming (SUCRA = 81.2%) showed superior results. For ROM, Single-Joint Rehab Robot (SUCRA = 84.7%) and AI-Feedback Motion Training (SUCRA = 83.7%) were most effective. Conventional or Usual Care and Asynchronous Telerehabilitation consistently ranked lower across all outcomes. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that AI-assisted rehabilitation strategies significantly improve pain relief, functional recovery, and ROM in individuals with MSDs. Interventions such as Therapeutic Exergaming, Robotic Exoskeletons, Gamified Exergaming, and Single-Joint Rehab Robots performed excellently in their respective domains, highlighting the potential of AI technologies in personalized treatment and enhancing patient recovery. However, further long-term research is needed to confirm the sustained effects of these interventions and optimize their clinical application. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD420251057777.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons
1991 · 14.172 Zit.
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
2013 · 7.645 Zit.
Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials
2016 · 7.496 Zit.
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
2021 · 7.382 Zit.
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
2019 · 7.132 Zit.