Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can AI Judge Usability? A Comparative Analysis of Generative Tools on Climate Conference Websites
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Introduction: This paper analyzes the usability of COP30 (Brazil) and COP29 (Azerbaijan) websites using four Generative Artificial Intelligences (GAIs): ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Microsoft 365 Copilot. Objective: To examine the role of GAIs as support tools in usability evaluations. Methodology: Following ISO 9241-210, each GAI received a standardized prompt, and outputs were analyzed through Directed Categorical Content Analysis. Results: GAIs identified issues such as deep navigation, absent accessibility mechanisms, and terminological inconsistencies, but showed limits in cultural sensitivity and technical accessibility. The study highlights opportunities and cautions for their application in real projects.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.239 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.095 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.463 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.428 Zit.