Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ethics, Bias, and Governance: Regulatory Perspectives on AI in Drug Development
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This comparative analysis of AI regulations in key markets provides an overview of the current state of AI regulations in the pharmaceutical industry. The use of AI in drug development is a rapidly evolving field, with regulatory agencies around the world establishing guidelines and regulations to ensure the safe and effective use of AI. The analysis highlights common themes and lessons that can be learned from global regulatory frameworks, including the importance of transparency, data quality, human oversight, and validation. The FDA's framework for AI-related software, the EU's AI regulatory framework, Japan's regulatory sandbox, China's AI-driven healthcare reform, and India's AI-driven healthcare initiatives are discussed as examples of regulatory approaches to AI in drug development. The importance of collaboration, industry-academia partnerships, government support, and public-private partnerships is also emphasized. The analysis concludes that regulatory agencies must stay up-to-date with global developments and best practices to ensure the safe and effective use of AI in drug development.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.231 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.084 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.444 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.423 Zit.