Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ambient Only vs. Longitudinal Data-Enhanced AI Documentation: A Pilot Study Quantifying the Value of Historical Clinical Context in Primary Care
0
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Background Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) clinical documentation tools have gained rapid adoption in healthcare to address physician burnout from documentation burden. However, current implementations primarily rely on real-time audio capture without systematically incorporating longitudinal patient data, potentially limiting documentation completeness for chronic disease management. Objective To compare documentation completeness between ambient audio-only workflows and those augmented with historical clinical data from electronic health records (EHRs) for type 2 diabetes and hypertension encounters in primary care. Methods We conducted a retrospective, paired, cross-sectional study of 354 primary care encounters in which diabetes mellitus (DM, n=119) and/or hypertension (HTN, n=281) were treated. Each condition instance was analysed twice to compare two methods of automated documentation: using only physician-patient conversation transcripts (termed “ambient only”) compared with consolidated automated documentation that includes historical clinical data in addition to the ambient conversation (ambient + history; termed “consolidated”). Documentation completeness was assessed using the “assessment” subset of the QNOTE clinical documentation quality measurement instrument, evaluating four domains: completeness, clinical coherence, clarity, conciseness. Scoring was automated using an LLM pipeline with physician validation on a 20% sample. Results Consolidated documentation achieved significantly higher mean total assessment composite score compared to ambient-only (94.8 vs. 80.1 on a scale of 0-100; difference 14.6 points; 95% CI 13.4-15.8; P<0.001). The largest improvements was observed in the completeness domain (difference 42.5 points; P<0.001). DM and HTN both showed similar performance of consolidated documentation vs. ambient only. Conclusions Augmenting ambient AI documentation with historical EHR data significantly improves documentation completeness for chronic disease management in primary care. These preliminary findings challenge the prevailing audio-first implementation paradigm and suggest that bidirectional EHR integration may be essential for comprehensive AI-assisted documentation, particularly for conditions requiring synthesis of longitudinal clinical data.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Machine Learning in Medicine
2019 · 3.620 Zit.
Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care
2006 · 3.168 Zit.
Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes
2005 · 2.965 Zit.
Studies in health technology and informatics
2008 · 2.903 Zit.
Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success
2005 · 2.683 Zit.