Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can AI assess literature like experts? An entropy-based comparison of ChatGPT-4o, DeepSeek R1, and human ratings
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
LLMs markedly reduce appraisal time while maintaining acceptable rating consistency in literature quality assessment. Although human validation is recommended for cases with high processing-time variability (>46.00 s), generative AI represents a promising approach for standardized, efficient, and scalable quality appraisal in evidence synthesis.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.436 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.311 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.753 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.523 Zit.