Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
What Is Required for AI to Improve the Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction? ICI‐RS 2025
0
Zitationen
16
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to improve the diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). Its effective deployment requires prioritization, regulatory oversight, rigorous validation, and clinician and patient engagement. METHODS: The Think Tank at the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society (ICI-RS) 2025 evaluated key considerations for successful AI implementation into LUTD clinical care. The topics included clinical triage framework, regulatory and legal principles, levels of evidence required for validation, and clinician and patient engagement to guide development. The group developed a narrative of the pressing matters related to AI implementation and a list of proposed research questions, which, when addressed, will help shape the future of the field. RESULTS: LUTD topics that should be prioritized for AI implementation include high-burden conditions with high unmet need such as neurogenic LUTD, bladder outlet obstruction, and overactive bladder. Regulatory frameworks such as the EU AI Act and the U.S. "Software as a Medical Device" and its associated guidance promote safety, transparency, and accountability. AI solutions should be as rigorously evaluated as other clinical devices or drug agents. Patient and clinician engagement are paramount to ensure innovation aligns with the pressing needs of patients and clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: AI's integration into LUTD care requires cross-disciplinary collaboration, prospective validation, and legal and ethical frameworks. AI must be developed and implemented with a strong focus on transparency, trust, and patient-centered care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is not a clinical trial and thus does not warrant registration as such.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.610 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.527 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 8.878 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.447 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.944 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Cleveland Clinic(US)
- University of Michigan(US)
- Michigan United(US)
- University Medical Center Utrecht(NL)
- Virginia Commonwealth University(US)
- University of Rome Tor Vergata(IT)
- Policlinico Tor Vergata(IT)
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham(GB)
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- Ghent University Hospital(BE)
- Hacettepe University(TR)
- Freeman Hospital(GB)
- Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital(IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea(IT)
- Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- University of Miami(US)
- University of Pennsylvania Health System(US)
- University of Pennsylvania(US)
- At Bristol(GB)
- Zuyderland Medisch Centrum(NL)