Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT–4 Omni, Gemini Advanced, and Gemini 1.5 in Answering Frequently Asked Questions Regarding High Tibial Osteotomy
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This study showed that ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-4 Omni, and Gemini 1.5 provided accurate and relevant responses on HTO, whereas Gemini Advanced exhibited limitations and underperformed in comparison with the other models.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.250 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.109 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.482 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.434 Zit.