Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ChatGPT-Generated Reviews for University Students� Papers � How are they Perceived?
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
With research proving the value of intensive tutoring for learners to improve their results but university educators often being limited in time and numbers, harnessing large language models (LLM) to bridge this gap and provide more support appears to be an auspicious solution. One promising avenue for this is students’ training in writing, since producing coherent texts is a strength of LLMs. To explore how university students and teachers perceive the quality of ChatGPT-generated reviews, a study was conducted in the frame of a university course on scientific writing for IT students, identifying the potential benefits but also the weaknesses of using ChatGPT as a reviewer for university students’ scientific texts.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.393 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.259 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.688 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.502 Zit.