Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparative performance of large language models in answering periodontology questions from the Turkish Dental Specialty Examination: a cross-sectional study on accuracy and coverage
2
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Among the tested LLMs, ChatGPT-4 consistently outperformed others in accuracy, while DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini demonstrated moderate performance and Claude lagged behind. Accuracy was lower in clinical questions, reflecting the contextual complexity of clinical reasoning. Coverage scores did not differ significantly, indicating broadly similar comprehensiveness of responses.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.287 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.140 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.534 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.450 Zit.