Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Knowledge-level comparison in pulpal and periapical diseases: dental students versus artificial intelligence models (Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4o): cross-sectional study
1
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Chatbots exhibited varying levels of accuracy in diagnosing pulpal and periapical diseases. ChatGPT-4o performed at a level similar to that of more clinically experienced students, suggesting its potential as a supportive tool in dental education and clinical decision support systems. However, the relatively lower accuracy rates of models such as Gemini and Microsoft Copilot underscore the continued importance of human expertise. These findings suggest that while AI systems may serve as complementary tools in education, they cannot fully replace clinical judgment grounded in human experience.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.402 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.270 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.702 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.507 Zit.