Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of Large Language Models for Plastic Surgery Patient Education: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and OpenEvidence
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
OpenEvidence generated materials of significantly higher quality and reliability than ChatGPT, suggesting it may serve as a more reliable alternative for patient education in aesthetic surgery practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.402 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.270 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.702 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.507 Zit.