Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
P33 Setting research priorities for the use of digital technology in the prevention and management of heart health: the results of the James Lind priority setting partnership
0
Zitationen
19
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
<h3>Background</h3> Patient outcomes in cardiovascular disease are characterised by inequalities in access to care and a failure to adequately address risk factors such as obesity, hypertension and physical inactivity. Digital technologies could help to address these challenges. <h3>Aim</h3> To generate a top 10 list of research priorities for the use of digital technology in the prevention and management of heart disease and heart conditions in the United Kingdom and Ireland, with equal input by people with lived experience and healthcare professionals. <h3>Methods</h3> James Lind Alliance methodology was used. An initial open response survey (completed between September and December 2023) gathered research ideas, which were filtered, categorised into summary questions, then checked against existing literature. An interim survey (completed between August and December 2024) asked respondents to select up to 10 questions that they considered most important. The top 20 ranked questions were discussed at a final workshop in December 2024. <h3>Results</h3> Ninety-nine respondents (62.2% with lived experience) submitted 422 questions. After removal of out-of-scope uncertainties and the creation of unanswered summary questions, 42 uncertainties were ranked by 133 respondents (73.7% with lived experience). The top 10 questions were agreed at the final workshop and the top three were: How can technology help people to prevent and manage a heart problem if they have one? How can technology give individualised support to help people manage their heart health? and How accurate and reliable is technology to measure and manage heart health and heart risk factors? <h3>Conclusion</h3> Future funding should be directed towards research questions identified by patients and healthcare professionals.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour
2020 · 10.204 Zit.
Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models
2012 · 5.770 Zit.
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review
2011 · 5.168 Zit.
Health Literacy
2004 · 3.409 Zit.
The evolving concept of health literacy
2008 · 2.787 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- The University of Sydney(AU)
- Edinburgh Napier University(GB)
- Wroclaw Medical University(PL)
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne(AU)
- The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital(KR)
- St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney(AU)
- Australian Catholic University(AU)
- University of Warwick(GB)
- University College London(GB)
- Edith Cowan University(AU)
- Queen's University Belfast(GB)
- University College Dublin(IE)
- Data Fusion International (Ireland)(IE)
- NHS Digital(GB)
- Golden Jubilee National Hospital(GB)
- Hatch (Canada)(CA)
- Patient Advocate Foundation(US)
- University of Edinburgh(GB)
- Primary Health Care(QA)
- Department of Public Health(US)
- The Queen's Medical Research Institute(GB)
- University of Leicester(GB)