Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Voice recognition in clinical medicine: process versus technology.
3
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2001
Jahr
Abstract
Large-vocabulary, continuous voice recognition technology, as well as the voice recognition industry, have matured to the point that the available tools are affordable and powerful enough to provide clinicians with an alternative to keyboard data entry. However, use of voice recognition technology in clinical medicine faces several practical process-oriented hurdles that may restrict the use of this technology to certain types of activities. For example, the use of voice recognition technology for dictation raises practical issues of privacy, security, and confidentiality. However, the same economic pressures that forced many clinicians to learn the keyboard instead of relying on a secretary may push clinicians from the keyboard to the microphone.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.534 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.423 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.917 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.582 Zit.