OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 15.03.2026, 02:28

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Enhancing Patient Understanding of Perianal Fistula MRI Findings Using ChatGPT: A Randomized, Single Centre Study

2025·0 Zitationen·DiagnosticsOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

14

Autoren

2025

Jahr

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Large Language Models (LLMs) may help translate complex Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) fistula reports into accessible, patient-friendly summaries. This study evaluated the clinical utility, safety, and patient acceptability of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4o) in generating such reports. <b>Methods:</b> A three-phase study was conducted at a single centre. Phase I involved prompt engineering and pilot testing of GPT-4o outputs for feasibility. Phase II assessed 250 consecutive MRI fistula reports from September 2024 to November 2024, each reviewed by a multi-disciplinary panel to determine hallucinations and thematic content. Phase III randomised patients to review either a simple or complex fistula case, each containing an original report and an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated summary (order randomised, origin blinded), and rate readability, trustworthiness, usefulness and comprehension. <b>Results:</b> Sixteen patients participated in Phase I pilot testing. In Phase II, hallucinations occurred in 11% of outputs, with unverified recommendations also identified. In Phase III, 61 patients (mean age 48, 41% female) evaluated paired original and AI-generated summaries. AI summaries scored significantly higher for readability, comprehension, and usefulness than original reports (all <i>p</i> < 0.001), with equivalent trust ratings. Mean Flesch-Kincaid scores were markedly higher for AI-generated summaries (66 vs. 26; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Clinicians highlighted improved anatomical structuring and accessible language, but emphasised risks of inaccuracies. A revised template incorporating Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT)-focused action points and a lay summary section was co-developed. <b>Conclusions:</b> LLMs can enhance the readability and patient understanding of complex MRI reports but remain limited by hallucinations and inconsistent terminology. Safe implementation requires structured oversight, domain-specific refinement, and clinician validation. Future development should prioritise standardised reporting templates incorporating clinician-approved lay summaries.

Ähnliche Arbeiten