Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluation of artificial intelligence generated responses of commonly asked ophthalmic queries
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate artificial intelligence generated responses of commonly asked ophthalmic queries. Methods: In this study, 10 common questions related to ophthalmic conditions were prepared by experienced ophthalmologists based on common queries by patients in India. The responses to these questions were obtained from ChatGPT. The responses were scored for accuracy, completeness, and understandability by two experienced unacquainted ophthalmologists. Results: In this study, mean values of overall scores for accuracy, completeness, understandability of ChatGPT responses graded fair (mean scores of 3.25 ± 0.75, 1.95 ± 1.5 and 2.3 ± 0.7, respectively). Understandability of responses to surgery related queries were significantly low compared to non-surgical ones ( P = 0.041). Conclusions: Study findings indicate ChatGPT’s responses to overall accuracy, completeness and understandability were just fair, suggesting ChatGPT offers information to some extent, but it falls short of expert ophthalmologist’s level.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.490 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.376 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.832 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.553 Zit.