Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
AI Literacy in Code
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The growing use of Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) or large language models (LLMs) in programming education has raised concerns about academic dishonesty and the trustworthiness of student submissions. To support educators in evaluating programming skills, it is crucial to identify whether code is written by students or generated by models like ChatGPT. This chapter introduces a framework consisting of two key components: (1) a supervised learning-based detector that distinguishes between human-written and ChatGPT-generated code, and (2) a novel post-hoc explanation mechanism that leverages GPT models to produce human-readable justifications for each classification. By combining accurate detection with interpretable explanations, the framework enhances assessment transparency, fosters educator trust, and supports academic integrity in AI-assisted learning environments.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.560 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.451 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.948 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.797 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.