Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Observer‐Performance Comparison of <scp>ChatGPT</scp> ‐5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Versus Veterinarians in Canine and Feline Fundus Interpretation: A Multi‐Reader, Multi‐Case Study
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Experienced veterinarians are most accurate in fundus interpretation, but their performance declines with increasing difficulty. LLMs, though less accurate, remain stable across cases and outperform novices, indicating value as training or decision-support tools. Future studies should assess whether expert-LLM collaboration enhances accuracy and efficiency.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.239 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.095 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.463 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.428 Zit.