Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
GenAI in Course Materials: Faculty Use and Perceptions
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) becomes increasingly relevant in higher education, faculty face growing pressure to integrate it ethically and effectively into teaching. While students are already using GenAI and seek faculty guidance, course materials often lack clear policies or instructional support. This study surveyed faculty and analyzed syllabi at a large public Midwestern research university to examine how GenAI is addressed in instruction. Findings reveal that faculty generally view GenAI as a potentially useful learning tool but report limited institutional guidance and inconsistent classroom practices. Despite some departmental efforts to establish GenAI policies, consensus on best practices is lacking. These results underscore the need for clearer institutional frameworks and faculty development to support ethical, pedagogically sound use of GenAI.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.245 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.102 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.468 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.429 Zit.