Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Introduction
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Since the public release of ChatGPT 3 years ago, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has moved from novelty to ubiquity in higher education. Yet, discourse around it has often outpaced evidence. On one hand, we have seen sweeping proclamations that AI will displace writing, undermine academic integrity, or even render education worthless. On the other, we have heard equally expansive claims that GenAI will democratize access, personalize instruction, and solve long-standing pedagogical challenges. What has been striking is how little of this conversation has been grounded in systematic, empirical inquiry. Pessimism and optimism have both tended to run ahead of data, leaving us without reliable models for integration.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.245 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.102 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.468 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.429 Zit.