Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The obligation to restrict AI in student writing
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract The response to student use of generative AI in higher education has been characterized by ambiguity, and no set of policies has yet become the accepted norm. Individual instructors are, so far, able to take wildly divergent approaches. In this article, I address the use of AI to specifically produce text for written assignments, arguing that universities have an obligation to regulate such uses. I argue that, even if using AI for writing is not technically plagiarism, it undermines education in the same way that plagiarism does. For this reason, educators have a moral obligation to treat AI-generated text, in the context of student education, the same way they would treat text written by a person. Given the impact AI text generation is already having on student practice, I argue that universities have a duty to act quickly and decisively to implement preventative measures and common norms restricting the use of AI in written assignments.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.245 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.102 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.468 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.429 Zit.