Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Detecting ChatGPT: A Survey of the State of Detecting ChatGPT-Generated Text
2
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
While recent advancements in the capabilities and widespread accessibility of generative language models, such as ChatGPT (Ope-nAI, 2022), have brought about various benefits by generating fluent human-like text, the task of distinguishing between human-and large language model (LLM) generated text has emerged as a crucial problem.These models can potentially deceive by generating artificial text that appears to be human-generated.This issue is particularly significant in domains such as law, education, and science, where ensuring the integrity of text is of the utmost importance.This survey provides an overview of the current approaches employed to differentiate between texts generated by humans and ChatGPT.We present an account of the different datasets constructed for detecting ChatGPT-generated text, the various methods utilized, what qualitative analyses into the characteristics of human versus ChatGPT-generated text have been performed, and finally, summarize our findings into general insights.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.393 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.259 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.688 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.502 Zit.