Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How social science academics use AI – Activities and tools
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
This study examines generative AI integration in Lithuania’s social sciences research and education following ChatGPT’s 2022 release, exploring usage patterns and challenges faced by researchers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 Vilnius University social sciences faculty members, selected for diverse AI-related expertise. Content analysis examined perceptions, roles and ethical considerations of AI use in academic activities. AI was perceived as valuable for information-seeking and research productivity, but tensions exist between adoption benefits and challenges related to academic integrity, methodological standards and variable output quality. Participants emphasised the need for clearer AI usage norms. Generative AI integration in social science research at Vilnius University presents significant opportunities and challenges. Addressing tensions between effort-saving and competence acquisition, unclear guidelines and AI output reliability is crucial for positive academic AI utilisation. The research highlights the importance of comprehensive guidelines and enhanced digital literacy to take advantage of AI benefits while maintaining academic integrity.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.200 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.051 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.416 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.410 Zit.