Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
TEACHING SCIENTIFIC WRITING WITH AI TECHNOLOGIES: TYPOLOGY-DRIVEN ERROR CORRECTION
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Using AI tools as writing assistants has become a reality. However, there is a problem of students’ over-relying on technology. Considering specific characteristics of scientific writing, students need to be taught to revise LLM-edited texts to avoid errors and maintain the individual author’s voice. We developed a framework for reviewing LLM-edited texts to guide students in evaluating a text’s morphology, lexis, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. This framework categorizes mistakes to clarify which are effectively edited by LLMs and which require human judgment. In a study with L2 English post-graduate students, we implemented this framework during the revision of scientific abstracts. A post-intervention survey showed that the framework effectively organized the editing process and improved writing outcomes. However, despite these benefits, participants maintained a preference for direct instructor feedback over LLM-generated suggestions.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.231 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.084 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.444 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.423 Zit.