Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The Clinician as DIRECTOR: Operationalizing Cinematic Storytelling for Clinical Documentation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Clinical documentation is undergoing a structural transformation. Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) systems and large language models are increasingly capable of generating complete clinical notes from conversation transcripts, structured data, and templates, often with minimal clinician input. While these systems reduce clerical burden and improve efficiency, they introduce a new and underrecognized risk: erosion of narrative control. AI-generated notes frequently resemble unedited footage rather than finished stories, dense with information yet lacking framing, causality, prioritization, and closure. Film and television faced an analogous challenge decades ago, integrating fragmented scenes, multiple contributors, and extensive post-production editing into coherent narratives through formal storytelling mechanics. This article bridges cinematic storytelling principles and clinical documentation, reframing clinicians as directors rather than scribes in an AI-driven environment. We operationalize narrative constructs such as framing, stakes, conflict, continuity, resolution, and foreshadowing as practical tools for constructing and editing clinical notes. The DIRECTOR Framework defines the core narrative engine of documentation, while two Director-Level Overrides ensure ethical tone and authorship integrity. Multiple before-and-after examples of AI-generated notes demonstrate how minimal clinician intervention can restore reasoning, preserve human intent, and improve patient safety. In the era of ambient AI, storytelling is not a metaphor for documentation. It is the control layer that keeps the medical record intelligible, defensible, and humane.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The SCARE 2018 statement: Updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines
2018 · 2.335 Zit.
The Levels of Evidence and Their Role in Evidence-Based Medicine
2011 · 2.115 Zit.
CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document
2017 · 2.019 Zit.
The SCARE Statement: Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines
2016 · 1.681 Zit.
Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: Results of a consensus meeting via the Internet
2003 · 1.201 Zit.