Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Hip fracture detection on radiographs using an artificial intelligence–based support tool: a diagnostic accuracy study
0
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
BackgroundAssessment of subtle hip fractures on radiographs can be difficult, especially among less experienced emergency physicians, which may prolong the diagnosis and ultimately time to surgery. Clinical artificial intelligence (AI) decision support tools have shown great potential in assisting the detection of fractures on radiographs.PurposeTo investigate how a CE-marked AI fracture detection tool affects junior doctors' diagnostic accuracy in detecting hip fractures on radiographs.Material and MethodsEight junior doctors with affiliation to the Accident and Emergency (A&E) department read 246 hip radiographic examinations with and without AI support. The reference standard was determined by two musculoskeletal radiologists, to measure sensitivity and specificity for readers without and with support from the AI tool as well as the AI tool's standalone performance.ResultsMean sensitivity in detecting hip fractures increased significantly from 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85-0.93) without AI support to 0.94 (95% CI = 0.92-0.97) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 9.27; <i>P</i> = 0.002) with AI support and the false-negative cases was thereby reduced by 49%. There was no significant change in mean specificity 0.90 (95% CI = 0.86-0.93) to 0.91 (95% CI = 0.88-0.94) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.34; <i>P</i> = 0.56). The AI standalone performance was 0.99 (95% CI = 0.99-1.00) and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.67-0.80) in sensitivity and specificity, respectively.ConclusionOut of eight junior doctors, seven detected more fractures with AI assistance than without. The applied performance gain for readers highlights the value of the product.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.214 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.071 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.429 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.418 Zit.