Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Mathematics teachers using generative AI to pose math problems related to students’ interests
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Recent advances in generative AI (GenAI) allow mathematics teachers to personalize tasks to their students’ out-of-school interests in areas like sports or music. This can allow teachers to better integrate their students’ unique experiences into the mathematics classroom. It also capitalizes on affordances of generative AI to create fine-grained mathematical tasks about specific topics. We examine a group of seven 7th-grade mathematics teachers designing personalized tasks using ChatGPT while engaging in practices of problem-posing. The teachers then gave these tasks to their students, received student feedback, and iterated on their approach. We examine qualitative and quantitative data to explore what teachers learned from the process of personalizing problems with generative AI, how this approach fit into their workflow and curriculum, and what they perceived as the quality and usability of the problems ChatGPT helped them write. We found our qualitative data suggested teachers learned about using generative AI, about problem-posing, and about creating a classroom culture that incorporated students’ interests, showing growth on multiple dimensions of AI-TPACK. The personalization process was seen by teachers as reasonably fitting into their workflow, although issues with time efficiency, the diversity and variability of students’ interests, and the difficulty of learning to use GenAI, were barriers. Finally, we found the generated problems could match students’ interests at a fine-grained level and teachers saw their potential to increase engagement; however, teachers cited issues with the realism and authenticity of the problems.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.287 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.140 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.534 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.450 Zit.