Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Exploring GenAI’s Potential Contributions as a Partner in SoTL Research: The Practice Model
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) presents both opportunities and challenges for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). This paper focuses on how SoTL scholars can thoughtfully integrate GenAI into their research processes while maintaining ethical integrity and preserving the essential human elements of scholarly inquiry. We critically examine GenAI’s capabilities, such as its potential to assist in brainstorming, to structure research ideas and protocols, and to expand methodological toolkits. However, we also emphasize its limitations, particularly regarding data reliability, inherent biases, and ethical concerns, such as transparency and student privacy. Through reflexive engagement with AI tools, we demonstrate how scholars can use GenAI as an intellectual partner rather than a substitute for critical thinking. We summarize our PRACTICE recommendations for use of GenAI in SoTL: Promote reflexivity; Read the literature; Act transparently; Conduct ethical research; Think critically; Invest in continuous learning; Check and validate outputs; Experiment and share. Ultimately, we argue that SoTL scholars must develop new competencies in order to navigate AI-enhanced research. While GenAI holds promise for advancing scholarly inquiry, its ethical use requires careful consideration and ongoing dialogue. By maintaining a balance between leveraging AI’s capabilities and upholding scholarly integrity, researchers can uphold SoTL practices that serve the field’s fundamental purposes: understanding, informing, and evolving teaching and learning for the benefit of students.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.231 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.084 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.444 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.423 Zit.