OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 14.03.2026, 21:53

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Educational Applications of AI-Based Chatbots in Nursing: A Scoping Review

2026·0 Zitationen·Nursing ReportsOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

6

Autoren

2026

Jahr

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The rapid expansion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language model-based chatbots has accelerated their adoption in higher education, including nursing. This scoping review mapped the use of AI-based chatbots in nursing education, including curricular domains, pedagogical approaches, educational outcomes, and implementation challenges. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guideline. Searches were performed across major bibliographic databases and grey literature sources. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies addressing the use of AI chatbots in nursing education or professional training were included. Data were extracted using a standardized instrument and synthesized through descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Results: Sixty-six studies (2019–2025) were included, with significant growth observed after 2023. Most studies employed quasi-experimental designs (37.9%) and were implemented in academic settings (83.3%). Application formats varied across online, hybrid, simulation-based, and classroom models. Reported benefits included improved learning performance, clinical reasoning, and student engagement. Key challenges involved the reliability of AI outputs, academic integrity, data protection, and limited institutional governance. Conclusions: AI-based chatbots represent promising tools to enhance nursing education, particularly when integrated into structured pedagogical strategies with active faculty supervision. Their use can support the development of clinical reasoning, student engagement, and personalized learning. However, methodological heterogeneity, ethical concerns, and governance gaps highlight the need for careful implementation and further rigorous research to ensure safe, effective, and pedagogically sound integration.

Ähnliche Arbeiten