Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Discrimination and racial bias in AI technology: A case study for the WHO
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
In a study published in Science in October 2019, researchers found significant racial bias in an algorithm used widely in the US health-care system to guide health decisions. The algorithm is based on cost (rather than illness) as a proxy for needs; however, the US health-care system spent less money on Black than on white patients with the same level of need. Thus, the algorithm incorrectly assumed that white patients were sicker than equally sick Black patients. The researchers estimated that the racial bias reduced the number of Black patients receiving extra care by more than half.<br/><br/>This case highlights the importance of awareness of biases in AI and mitigating them from the onset to prevent discrimination (based on e.g. race, gender, age or disability). Biases may be present not only in the algorithm but also, for example, in the data used to train the algorithm. Many other types of bias, such as contextual bias, should be considered. Stakeholders, particularly AI programmers, should apply “ethics by design” and mitigate biases at the outset in developing a new AI technology for health.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.339 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.211 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.614 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.478 Zit.