Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
<scp>AI</scp> And the Editors' Ghost: Who Is the Writer Now?
0
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
ABSTRACT This an exploration of the use of AI in research and writing. It builds upon the ‘Harbingers’ project, an international and longitudinal study of early career researchers (ECRs) and scholarly communication. In the fourth phase of the project, we returned to the theme of AI, in particular AI as ‘ghostwriter’. Our sources are transcripts of conversational, open‐form interviews with over 60 ECRs from Britain, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Russia, and other countries. For an initial analysis of the transcripts, we used Google NotebookLM. An overarching and thematic summary of the data was produced in minutes, that would otherwise have occupied our research team for weeks. The unprompted text, immediately plausible and coherent, was regarded by all national interviewers as impressive. Here, using a relatively small, convenience sample, we compare the AI generated summaries both against our original data and those first impressions. We reflect upon our own experience of using AI and that of our interviewees. This paper is about how we used AI as an experiment, our reaction to it, how that chimes, resonates, echoes the experiences of the ECRs. It is a calibration for our future data analysis.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
2019 · 31.486 Zit.
Techniques to Identify Themes
2003 · 5.367 Zit.
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
2007 · 4.057 Zit.
Basic Content Analysis
1990 · 4.045 Zit.
Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts
2013 · 3.036 Zit.