OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 05.05.2026, 02:44

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Perceptions, effectiveness, and credibility of artificial intelligence in healthcare among medical students and interns: A cross-sectional study

2026·0 Zitationen·International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)Open Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

1

Autoren

2026

Jahr

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare and medical education; however, its successful integration depends on the perceptions, perceived effectiveness, and credibility among future healthcare professionals. This study aimed to evaluate these dimensions among medical students and interns. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 151 participants using a structured, self-administered questionnaire. The instrument included demographic variables and Likert-scale items assessing perception, effectiveness, and credibility of AI. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Likert-scale responses were summarized and reported in tabular form. The mean age of participants was 23.9 ± 2.8 years; 82.8% were medical students and 64.9% were male. Overall, participants demonstrated a positive perception of AI. A large majority agreed that AI improves diagnostic accuracy (86.1%), enhances patient outcomes (86.1%), supports treatment decisions (84.8%), and reduces medical errors (78.1%). Strong support was observed for integrating AI into the medical curriculum (82.1%), and 86.7% recognized its benefits in disease management. Perceived effectiveness was consistently high across domains. However, credibility perceptions were comparatively moderate. While 62.9% trusted AI-based clinical decision-making, 80.1% considered AI reliable only with physician supervision, and 86.1% emphasized the need for human verification. Willingness to rely on AI for critical decisions was lower (52.3%). In conclusion, medical students and interns show strong acceptance of AI effectiveness, alongside conditional trust in its credibility, highlighting the need for structured education and supervised implementation.

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Institutionen

Themen

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen