Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How clinicians should prioritise the use of artificial intelligence in Singapore’s healthcare system: Correspondence
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
The readers writing this letter read with interest Hwang et al.’s article on augmented intelligence in healthcare,1 and agree that it would be most responsible for artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance, rather than replace clinical judgment. The more urgent question for Singapore’s clinicians today is therefore not whether to use AI, but where to prioritise its deployment for responsible, meaningful impact.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.674 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.583 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.105 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.862 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.