OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 06.05.2026, 08:04

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Seven deadly sins in artificial intelligence for digital medicine

2026·1 Zitationen·npj Digital MedicineOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

1

Zitationen

5

Autoren

2026

Jahr

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical environments, raising questions of trust, fairness, empathy, and governance. The ethical terrain surrounding AI in medicine remains unstable despite its rapid adoption. We introduce the "Seven Deadly Sins of AI in Medicine", a conceptual framework of recurring systemic failure modes: (i) Blind Trust, (ii) Overregulation, (iii) Dehumanization, (iv) Misaligned Optimization, (v) Overinforming and False Forecasting, (vi) Misapplied Statistics, and (vii) Self-Referential Evaluation. The framework was developed through systematic synthesis of scientific literature, clinical guidelines, and regulatory frameworks prior to any empirical data collection. To validate this pre-established framework, we conducted a global, cross-professional opinion poll of 914 stakeholders from 143 countries between July 2024 and March 2025. Results confirmed broad agreement with each pre-identified risk, revealing cross-cultural convergence in ethical concern alongside persistent divides in attitudes toward regulation-particularly between technologically advanced nations and emerging economies. We further propose an inversion of the framework into seven cardinal virtues for AI in medicine, offering actionable principles to guide responsible development and governance. The goal is to move beyond scattered ethical guidelines toward a unified diagnostic tool for trustworthy, human-centered medical AI.

Ähnliche Arbeiten