Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluation of ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek from a Privacy Perspective
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare has revolutionized research, diagnostics, and patient care. In particular, the emergence of ChatGPT and the recent rise of DeepSeek have drawn significant attention to this landscape. This empirical work provides a comparative performance evaluation of these models and their role in medical education from a privacy perspective. Our study shows that, at present, DeepSeek-R1 is based on enhanced reasoning capabilities, while the ChatGPT-4o counterpart, on the other hand, is designed with support for text, audio, and vision which is lacking in standard DeepSeek models. However, due to the distillation techniques used, DeepSeek has an advantage over ChatGPT in terms of resource requirements. We evaluate both models on the MedQA dataset from privacy perspectives where ChatGPT returns 94% correct answers compared to 91% with DeepSeek, though DeepSeek demonstrates consistency in explanatory responses.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.551 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.443 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.942 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.792 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.