Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Independent bone-level diagnostic accuracy study of an AI tool for detecting appendicular skeletal fractures on radiographs
0
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Question Can a commercially available AI tool reliably detect fractures across anatomical regions, confounding factors, and individual bones -and are there patterns in diagnostic limitations? Findings The AI tool achieved 89% sensitivity and 88% specificity with consistent accuracy across subgroups. However, accuracy dropped for old fractures and irregular short bones. Clinical relevance Despite broad regulatory approval, AI fracture tools may overlook clinically relevant weaknesses. Our in-depth evaluation highlights limitations, guiding responsible clinical use and future research to support safe AI implementation in radiology and informed medicolegal regulation.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.534 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.423 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.917 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.582 Zit.