Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Outpatient order accuracy. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of requisition order entry accuracy in 660 institutions.
49
Zitationen
2
Autoren
1999
Jahr
Abstract
Context Laboratory test order entry errors potentially delay diagnosis, consume resources, and cause patient inconvenience. Objective To evaluate the frequency and causes of computer order entry errors in outpatients. Design Cross-sectional survey and prospective sample of errors. Participants answered questions about their test order entry policies and practices. They then examined a sample of outpatient requisitions and compared information on the requisition with information entered into the laboratory computer system. Order entry errors were divided into 4 types: tests ordered on the requisition, but not in the computer; tests performed but not ordered on the requisition; physician name discrepancies; and test priority errors. Participants Six hundred sixty laboratories enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes program. Main outcome measure Overall order entry error rate. Results A total of 5514 (4.8%) of 114 934 outpatient requisitions were associated with at least 1 order entry error. The median participant reported 1 or more order errors on 6.0% of requisitions; 10% of institutions reported errors with at least 18% of requisitions. Of the 4 specific error types, physician name discrepancies had the highest error rate, and test priority errors the lowest error rate. Four institutional factors were significantly associated with higher overall error rates: orders verbally communicated to the laboratory; no policy requiring laboratory staff to compare a printout or display of ordered tests with the laboratory requisitions to confirm that orders had been entered correctly; failure to monitor the accuracy of outpatient order entry on a regular basis; and a higher percentage of occupied beds (ie, a busier hospital). Conclusions Computer order entry errors are common, involving 5% of outpatient requisitions. Laboratories may be able to decrease error rates by regularly monitoring the accuracy of order entry, substituting written and facsimile orders for verbal orders, and instituting a policy in which orders entered into computer systems are routinely rechecked against orders on requisitions.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Machine Learning in Medicine
2019 · 3.802 Zit.
Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care
2006 · 3.174 Zit.
Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes
2005 · 2.971 Zit.
Studies in health technology and informatics
2008 · 2.903 Zit.
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success
2020 · 2.731 Zit.