Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
AMIA's Code of Professional and Ethical Conduct
32
Zitationen
12
Autoren
2012
Jahr
Abstract
AMIA, as other professional societies, has a long-standing interest in promoting a strong ethical framework for its membership. This white paper presents the latest AMIA Code of Professional and Ethical Conduct. It was approved in November of 2011 by the AMIA Board of Directors. This document constitutes a revision of, and update to, the first code, approved and published in J Am Med Inform Assoc 1 in 2007. In an effort to keep pace with the field's vitality, the code presented here is intended to be a dynamic document, and will continue to evolve as AMIA and the field itself evolve. AMIA will publish on its web site this version of the code as part of a process that seeks ongoing response from, and involvement by, AMIA members. The code is meant to be practical and easily understood, so it is compact and uses general language. Unlike the ethics codes of some professional societies, the AMIA code is not intended to be prescriptive or legislative; it is aspirational, and as such, provides the broad strokes of a set of important ethical principles especially pertinent to the field of biomedical and health informatics. The code is organized around the common roles of AMIA members and the constituents they serve—including patients, students, and others—and with whom they interact. The AMIA Board and the AMIA Ethics Committee encourage members to offer suggestions for improvements and other changes. In this way, the code will continue to progress and best serve AMIA and the larger informatics community. Codes of ethics for professionals present special challenges in conception and execution. The goal of this code is to lay out the core values of this profession in a way that inspires AMIA members to acknowledge and embrace these values. While the crafting of the code involved many …
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Machine Learning in Medicine
2019 · 3.781 Zit.
Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care
2006 · 3.173 Zit.
Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes
2005 · 2.970 Zit.
Studies in health technology and informatics
2008 · 2.903 Zit.
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success
2020 · 2.721 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University of Miami(US)
- Erasmus University Rotterdam(NL)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham(US)
- The Ohio State University(US)
- University of Utah(US)
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport(US)
- Johns Hopkins Medicine(US)
- Johns Hopkins University(US)
- Mayo Clinic(US)
- University of California, San Francisco(US)
- Buffalo State University(US)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York(US)