Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
OC01.02: Accuracy and readability of patient‐focused information on obstetrics ultrasound imaging from online sources versus ChatGPT‐generated
2
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
To investigate the accuracy and readability of patient-focused Information on obstetrics ultrasound imaging. We blinded expert reviewers to evaluate the accuracy of ChatGPT-generated information compared with the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), Radiologyinfo.org, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS) and the UK National Health Service (NHS) answers on obstetrics ultrasound. We further evaluated the average Flesch-Kincaid readability grade level and Flesch reading ease score for each website and compared with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and American Medical Association (AMA) recommended readability parameters. An overall 100% interrater agreement was achieved for the answers to the online sourced information and 95% for ChatGPT outputs. The average grade reading level of information on ISUOG, Radiologyinfo.org, ACOG, BMUS, NHS, and ChatGPT was 8.62 ± 3.6; 95% CI [6.46, 10.77], 12.21 ± 4.7; 95% CI [8.87, 15.6], 12.8 ± 2.9; 95% CI (9.2, 16.4], 10.5 ± 3.6; 95% CI [8.2, 12.8], and 10.5 ± 3.6; 95% CI [8.2, 12.8], respectively. On the other hand, the average reading ease score of information exceeded the AMA recommended parameters as follows: ISUOG, Radiologyinfo.org, ACOG, BMUS, NHS, and ChatGPT was 59.7 ± 14.6; 95% CI [50.9, 68.5] (“fairly difficult high school”), 38.67 ± 16.5; 95% CI [26.9, 50.5] (“difficult college”), 43.5 ± 13.2; 95% CI [26.9, 60.0] (“difficult college”), 46.9 ± 19.7; 95% CI [34.3, 59.4] (“difficult college”), and 65.6 ± 11.0; 95% CI [59.0, 72.3] (“difficult college”], respectively. ChatGPT provides accurate patient-focused information on obstetrics ultrasound imaging. However, the readability of currently available patient-focused information on obstetrics ultrasound imaging may be incomprehensible to the general public.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.239 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.095 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.463 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.428 Zit.