OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 29.03.2026, 22:22

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

AI’s Accuracy in Extracting Learning Experiences from Clinical Practice Logs: An Observational Study (Preprint)

2024·0 ZitationenOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

2

Autoren

2024

Jahr

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Improving the quality of education in clinical settings requires an understanding of learners’ experiences and learning processes. However, this is a significant burden on learners and educators. If learners’ learning records could be automatically analyzed and experiences visualized, it would enable real-time tracking of their progress. Large language models (LLMs) may be useful for this purpose, although their accuracy has not been sufficiently studied. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to explore the accuracy of predicting the actual clinical experiences of medical students from their learning log data during clinical clerkship using LLMs. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> This study was conducted at the Nagoya University School of Medicine. Learning log data from medical students participating in a clinical clerkship from April 22, 2024, to May 24, 2024, were used. The Model Core Curriculum (MCC) for Medical Education was employed as a template to extract experiences. OpenAI’s ChatGPT was selected for this task after a comparison with other LLMs. Prompts were created using the learning log data and provided to ChatGPT to extract experiences, which were then listed. A web application using GPT-4-turbo was developed to automate this process. The accuracy of the extracted experiences was evaluated by comparing them with the corrected lists provided by the students. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Twenty out of thirty-three 6th-year medical students participated in this study, resulting in 40 datasets. The Jaccard Index was 0.59, indicating moderate agreement. Sensitivity and specificity were 62.67% and 99.37%, respectively. The results suggest that GPT-4-turbo accurately identifies many of the actual experiences but misses some because of insufficient detail or a lack of student records. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> This study demonstrated that LLMs, such as GPT-4-turbo, can predict clinical experiences from learning logs with high specificity but moderate sensitivity. Future improvements in AI models and the combination of learning logs with other data sources, such as electronic medical records, may enhance the accuracy. Utilizing naturally accumulated data for assessment could reduce the burden on learners and educators while improving the quality of educational assessments in medical education. </sec>

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Themen

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen