Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Applying ChatGPT and AI‐Powered Tools to Accelerate Evidence Reviews
18
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been used to improve the productivity of evidence review and synthesis since at least 2016, with EPPI‐Reviewer and Abstrackr being two prominent examples. However, since the release of ChatGPT by OpenAI in late 2022, the use of generative AI for research, especially for text‐based data analysis, has exploded. In this article, we used a critical reflection approach to document and evaluate the capacity of different generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, GPT for Google Sheets and Docs, Casper AI, and ChatPDF to assist in the early stages of a rapid evidence review process. Our results demonstrate that these tools can boost research productivity in formulating search strings and screening literature, but they have some notable weaknesses, including producing inconsistent results and occasional errors. We recommend that researchers exercise caution when using generative AI technologies by designing a thorough research strategy and review protocol to ensure effective monitoring and quality control.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.245 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.102 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.468 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.429 Zit.