Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Augmenting Community Nursing Practice With Generative AI: A Formative Study of Diagnostic Synergies Using Simulation-Based Clinical Cases
3
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making of experienced community nurses versus state-of-the-art generative AI (GenAI) systems for simulated patient case scenarios. METHODS: In the months of 5 to 6/2024, 114 community Israeli nurses completed a questionnaire including 4 medical case studies. Responses were also collected from 3 GenAI models (ChatGPT-4, Claude 3.0, and Gemini 1.5), analyzed both without word limits and with a 10-word constraint. Responses were scored on accuracy, speed, and comprehensiveness. RESULTS: Nurses scored higher on average compared to the shortened GenAI responses. GenAI responses were faster but more verbose, and contained unnecessary information. Gemini (full version) and Claude (full version) achieved the highest accuracy among the GenAI models. CONCLUSIONS: While GenAI shows potential to support aspects of nursing practice, human clinicians currently exhibit advantages in holistic clinical reasoning abilities, a skill requiring experience, contextual knowledge, and ability to bring concise and practical responses. Further research is needed before GenAI can adequately substitute nursing expertise.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
2011 · 14.027 Zit.
Treatment of Comatose Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Induced Hypothermia
2002 · 5.406 Zit.
Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review
2005 · 3.811 Zit.
Defining and Assessing Professional Competence
2002 · 3.061 Zit.
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
2002 · 2.810 Zit.