Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Generative AI in Action: Acceptance and Use among Higher Education Staff Pre- and Post-Training
1
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The adoption of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) in higher education (HE) has led to an eminent need to foster genAI literacy among staff. In this longitudinal study, we examined if participation in a genAI introductory course was associated with an increased intention to use genAI tools among HE staff through a one-group pre/posttest design. We posed five hypotheses based on the extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) and found a significant and large increase in use from the beginning (T1) to the end (T2) of the course. Similarly, all UTAUT2 predictor variables significantly increased while AI attitudes did not. Through PLS-SEM we discovered that Habit and AI attitudes were significant predictors of Behavioral intentions at T1, but that none of the examined variables significantly predicted Behavioral intentions at T2. Behavioral intentions at T1 did not significantly predict Behavioral intentions at T2, either. However, the UTAUT2 factors combined with AI attitudes explained 79.5% of the variance in Behavioral intentions at T1 and 82.4% at T2. Neither gender, age, experience with genAI, nor teaching position moderated the relationship between AI acceptance at T1 and T2. Our study is the first to implement a pre/post design utilizing the UTAUT2 framework among HE staff. Our findings suggest that course participation is associated with changes in prior intention patterns, potentially reducing disparities in familiarity and use, thereby facilitating professional development within a collegial community. Our novel results have implications for future research and HE institutional professional development worldwide.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.200 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.051 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.416 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.410 Zit.