Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluation of generative AI assistance in clinical nephrology: Assessing GPT-4, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.0 Ultra, and PaLM 2 in patient interaction and renal biopsy interpretation
2
Zitationen
20
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
GPT-4o emerged as the most accurate and consistent model across most evaluation categories, while GPT-4 demonstrated superior empathy and balanced performance. PaLM 2 and Gemini 1.0 Ultra showed strengths in specific areas, highlighting the potential for tailored applications of generative AI in nephrology clinical practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.214 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.071 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.429 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.418 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- China Medical University Hospital(TW)
- China Medical University(TW)
- National Chung Hsing University(TW)
- Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital(TW)
- Asia University(TW)
- Taipei Medical University(TW)
- Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(TW)
- Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(TW)
- Chang Gung University(TW)
- National Changhua University of Education(TW)