Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
AI as a Research Partner: Advocating for Co-Authorship in Academic Publications
1
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This article critically examines the evolving role of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in scholarly authorship, challenging prevailing norms that categorically exclude AI systems from formal recognition. It argues that the current authorship framework—rooted in assumptions about human agency, legal accountability, and conscious intent—is ill-equipped to accommodate the epistemic contributions of increasingly autonomous AI collaborators. Drawing from case studies, authorship policies, and philosophical literature, the paper contends that academic integrity would be better served by adopting a contribution-based model of authorship, one that prioritizes transparency, intellectual input, and distributed responsibility over metaphysical attributes. The article concludes by calling for a proactive redefinition of authorship standards, urging scholarly institutions to adapt to hybrid human–machine knowledge production in a way that is both ethically consistent and epistemologically grounded.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.418 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.288 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.726 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.516 Zit.