Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ChatGPT vs. Students: A Comparative Analysis of Performance in Corporate Finance Exams
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This study assesses the performance of ChatGPT in comparison with that of undergraduate students in 60 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) of Corporate Finance exams that sought to measure students’ abilities to solve different types of questions (descriptive and numerical) and of varying difficulty levels (basic and intermediate). Our results indicate that overall, the students performed significantly better in all question categories except ChatGPT, outperforming the students in descriptive questions. These results imply that while AI tools offer great potential in the teaching and learning domain, we must consider their limitations, especially in the application of numerical skills and the ability to develop practical solutions. Similar to other areas, AI is becoming inevitable in education, particularly in Finance, but it should be used cautiously as a supplementary tool, not completely replacing human intelligence.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.339 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.211 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.614 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.478 Zit.