Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Measuring student receptivity to ChatGPT in higher education: A case study from Peru
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The continuous rise of artificial intelligence tools in educational settings highlights the importance of understanding how students position themselves in relation to these technologies. This study aims to analyze the attitudes toward ChatGPT among Peruvian university students, considering the cognitive, affective, and behavioral components, as well as the metric properties of the instrument. A quantitative approach was employed, with a descriptive-comparative and instrumental research design, involving 464 Peruvian students from different academic disciplines. The results indicated that, after performing confirmatory factor analysis, the final model consisted of 33 items assessing attitudes toward ChatGPT across cognitive, affective, and behavioral components, with slightly acceptable fit indices (χ²/df, p &lt; 0.05, SRMR, RMSEA, TLI, CFI, and GFI) and adequate factor loadings (λ &gt; 0.3). In addition, the instrument showed satisfactory reliability evidence (α<sub>ordinal</sub> and Ω<sub>ordinal</sub> &gt; 0.7). Another finding revealed that engineering students exhibited a significantly more favorable affective attitude toward ChatGPT (p = 0.03) compared to students from the social and natural sciences. No significant differences (p &gt; 0.05) were found in students’ attitudes based on sex or age. In conclusion, although future engineers display a more favorable affective attitude than students from other disciplines, overall attitudes toward ChatGPT do not show relevant differences across other sociodemographic factors. Moreover, the instrument proved to be valid and reliable with 33 items, thus representing a solid and less dense tool for future research.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.245 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.100 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.466 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.429 Zit.